Connect with us
background

News

The Evolution of CO₂ Training Tables

Published

on

With influences from Ben Noble, Sarah Whitcher, Yann Dumas and Walter Johnson

In this article, we take a look at alternative ways of thinking about CO₂ tables by questioning the basic assumptions of the below example and exploring the opportunities we can derive from our answers.

If you have been in one of our advanced courses, you will already have trained using our re-thought CO₂ tables. We have added a little more thought to keep you from getting bored. Look at the minimum overall hold time towards the end of the article.

Breathe-up Hold
2:00 2:00
1:45 2:00
1:30 2:00
1:15 2:00
1:00 2:00
0:45 2:00
0:30 2:00
0:15 2:00

The mother of all CO tables.

We all have probably seen this ancient[ancient] prototype of a CO₂ table and likely used it or one very much like it for our first training sessions. It has apparently been the basis for all CO₂ training apps I have seen on smartphones or computers, and is featured in most freediving course curricula.

In order to structure what we are going to do, let us first define the goal we are pursuing.

What is the Purpose of a CO Table?

A common definition of CO₂ Tables:

A CO Table is a sequence of breath holds which increases the amount of CO with each hold in order to train the physical and mental tolerance to increased CO levels in the body.

While other definitions are possible, this one is useful for our purposes and it will be the basis for our thought experiment.

How can a sequence of breath holds best achieve this goal? In order to train an atomic skill in any sport, we want to remove as many other factors as possible in order to facilitate focus on the one skill at hand. This suggests that we best train CO₂ tolerance in static breath holds, possibly even dry, which leaves us with only one other factor to think about: O₂. Once we have explored this possibility, we can go on to tackle dynamic CO₂ tables using the principles laid out in this article.

In order to make sure that we can focus on our experience of increased CO₂ levels, we want to make sure that our table is designed to ensure we never come close to hypoxia. We want the pure, worry-free CO₂ experience.

A CO table exposes the diver to high CO levels without getting near hypoxic states.

How can we now create a CO₂ table from scratch that will do that for us? First, let us think about the breathe-ups.

Considering Breathe-Ups

So we want a breathe-up that will always supply us with enough O₂ while retaining as much as possible of the CO₂ produced during the last breath hold. Let’s take a look at how the above table tries to achieve this goal.

In the classic example, the breathe-up decreases by a given amount of time (here 15 seconds) before each hold, and increases the amount of CO₂ retained only towards the end of the table. So we spend a lot of time exhaling our precious CO₂ that we came to collect in the first place.

So why am I not a fan of this approach? Time is precious[time] – I want to offer my students efficient training methods – and it is not a very useful unit to account for amounts of gas exchange.

How much gas do we exchange in 15 seconds? – That depends on how much we breathe in 15 seconds, which is defined by how deeply and how often we breathe. The above approach can only provide consistent results when we assume a constant breathing volume and -frequency. Those are big assumptions, especially given the influence of increased CO₂ levels, which will very likely increase breathing frequency and volume, especially in relatively inexperienced freedivers who are most likely to train CO₂ tables. Let us reduce the number of assumptions and provide definitions instead.

First, we define one breath to be a full breath. That means that every time we breathe, we exchange our full vital capacity of gas in our respiratory system.

Full exhale, full inhale.

Now let us ask two relevant questions:

How much CO are we exhaling in our breathe-up?

To answer our first question, we can use a unit of measurement that is commonly present and stable enough for consistency and that we are using anyway: One full breath. On each full breath, we purge (yes, I know, purge …) exactly the CO₂ content of one lung full of air. One exhalation has thus become our unit of CO₂ reduction in our breathe-ups.

Count your full breaths to know how much you are breathing.

Having defined this in a simple, straightforward way, let us go on with the second question:

How much O do we need for each breath hold?

That one is equally easy when we allow ourselves to let go of volumetric units. How many breaths does a freediver ever need for a dive? – Always just one. We do not really need to know more than that.

We know that we want the holds in our table to be far away from taking us into hypoxia, so one breath will be all we ever need to fully recover and prepare for the next hold. We will take a closer look at the effect this has on the holds below.

At this point it becomes clear where this is heading: The One-Breath Table. I was introduced to this training table when training with Ben Noble:

The Noble Table™ was much simpler to write down and much simpler to practise:

Breathe-up Hold Repetitions
One breath 1:15 8

(Yes, that means: Lift head out of water, exhale, inhale, head goes back in the water.)

Simple and effective. One breath is enough, a 1:15 hold is definitely not taxing, our time in the water is dramatically reduced and we get good exposure to high CO₂ levels quite quickly.

But what if we want more CO₂? Can we tune this table to give us more CO₂ or save even more time? If it’s  just to let out the freediving geek in us?

Yes we can.

Considering Holds

To further work on the efficiency of our CO₂ table, we can start to think about the holds themselves. Ben reduced them from two minutes to 1:15 initially, as these holds would become difficult enough very quickly. Some progress had been made.

The declared goal of our CO₂ table is to spend lots of time at high CO₂ levels with minimal overhead. The one breath interval makes sure that we retain the maximum amount of CO₂ in between holds, now let us see if we can also base the holds on the CO₂ exposure instead of a given, fixed breath hold time.

Looking at the classic example above, we find that during the first few dives, we will spend most of our time cruising and we do not get to experience a lot of high CO₂, simply because we have been exhaling most of it in our long breathe-ups. Contractions will probably only come into play in hold number two, possibly even later.

How useful is time before contractions in a CO₂ table? Not very. No contractions means we have too little CO₂ to train our tolerance to it – we are wasting out time. Would we like a guaranteed CO₂ exposure on each dive? Sure, that is why we are here, after all!

So we go on to define a hold by the time spent with high CO₂ (i.e. contractions) and our table will look something like this:

 

Breathe-up Hold Repetitions
One breath 1st contraction + 0:45 8

 

See that? We get 45 seconds of contractions guaranteed on each and every hold. Effective training right from the first dive.
So what about safety? We still want to make sure that our dives don’t get too close to hypoxia. Well, let’s take a look at what the holds in this particular table would roughly look like when performed:

# 1st contraction total dive time
1 ~2:30 3:15
2 ~2:00 2:45
3 ~1:00 1:45
4 ~0:30 1:15
5 ~0:20 1:05
6 ~0:10 0:55
7 ~0:10 0:55
8 ~0:10 0:55

 

What happens here, is that the overall dive time decreases as the CO₂ level increases, simply because our contractions come on sooner with each hold[headspace]. Our safety margin is expanding the tougher the holds get (and they do get tough), which means that we can relax more and more and focus on our task, knowing that we are really doing quite short holds each time.

What if we want more?

Enter the Dumas Extension™: While brainstorming on these,  Yann Dumas found that the last few dives in this table were really a waste of our efforts. He pointed out that a one-minute dive was quite short and we could easily and safely add a few seconds of extra CO₂ to the last few dives, giving us extra time with contractions still with a broad safety margin. – Bonus! This allows us to define a minimum duration of our dives, which we can derive from our level of training:

 

Breathe-up Hold Repetitions
One breath 1st contraction + 0:60s, min dive time 1:15 8

We now have a simple, solid table that gives us safe breath holds, loads of CO₂ and is easily adjustable for our needs and level of training. We simply give a signal to our buddy when we have our first contraction and our buddy will count us down and take care of the rest. We just sit it out.

What’s not to like? – Well, I always try to get rid of the need for stop watches wherever I can. After all, I want to train my body, not my watch. So how could we go about getting rid of the stop watch?

How can we measure the amount of CO we have been exposed to in a single dive?

Again, we are looking at a useful answer for our training, not necessarily a volumetric one. To answer this, we can – again – take a look at the reality of performing one of these tables and we will find one very prominent feature: Contractions.

As a variation on this theme, we can count our contractions instead of timing them, so we end up with something like this:

Breathe-up Hold Repetitions
One breath 25 contractions 8

 

Now, that is nice and simple. We can capture the essence of this table very quickly (it’s a 25 x 8, right?) we don’t need any additional hardware. And, yes, we still want a buddy as soon as we are in the water.

Facit

Removing time from the equation and using our breaths and contractions as units of measurement  allows us to focus on the objective of experiencing high levels of CO₂. We can dramatically increase the efficiency and safety margin of CO₂ tables, spending less time in the water with more CO₂ exposure.

To try it out, start with any of these variations and take it from there:

Breathe-Up Hold Repetitions
Example 1 One Breath 1st contraction + 45s 8
Example 2 One Breath 1st contraction + 60s, minimum duration 1:15 8
Example 3 One Breath 25 contractions 8
The Whitcher™ One Breath 1st contraction + 60 until you cry

 

Pro Tips:

  • If you are worried about the overall duration of the first hold, just keep that one a bit shorter, no problem. You should not hit a personal best in a CO₂ table.
  • You have one breath. Breathe sloooowly. Really. — Slow exhale, slow inhale. Take a few seconds for each. It will feel much better than breathing in and out quickly.
  • Have your buddy count your dives and coach you. Especially dives 3 and 4 tend to be tricky. Have your buddy talk you through them.
  • Once you have wrapped your head around these static tables, go on and apply the same principles to dynamic tables. – Think nothing but form and let your buddy count and coach. I recommend sticking to the same distance throughout the table. Best workout you’ve had in a while.

 

Ancient

Ancient in freediving terms, that is. The sport is still a very young one.

Measurement

Do we need to know this in litres or mol? I can not think how that would be of practical use in training, while it would be very interesting in research

Time

For some good thoughts on time and the mindset in freediving, here are some quotes from Momo by Michael Ende. A book well worth reading. Note how Beppo must be a freediver the way he describes his job.

Headspace

Interestingly, contractions do not set in instantly in the later dives, even with stupidly high CO₂ levels (try 1:15 x 15). Our headspace gives us some seconds of grace.

Wonka

These tables have been dubbed the “Wonka Tables” – Thank you, I guess. 🙂

Richard comes from a background in the sciences. After earning a degree in Biology and Information Engineering he put his skills to use in pharmaceutical research and development before becoming a professional freediver in 2008. Richard has been certified to instructor level by several agencies, most notably by Umberto Pelizzari of the Apnea Academy and AIDA International where he is now an Instructor Trainer and member AIDA Education. His dedicated training with some of the best freedivers in the world earned him a place in the German national team at the AIDA Team World Championships 2008 in Sharm El Sheikh, after which he decided to put his experience and training into freediving education full time. Before co-founding We Freedive with Sarah Witcher he had been working with several of the most active freediving schools in the world.

Gear News

Introducing the TR-80, IR-50 and CS-30 Regulators from DYNAMICNORD

Published

on

regulator

Whether you are a beginner or a professional diver – with the three new main regulators from DYNAMICNORD, everyone will find their favourite regulator. They all look super stylish.

Excellent performance with the TR-80

Quality and performance are the be-all and end-all for regulators. It is not for nothing that the TR stands for Tec Reg. The innovative design of the TR-80 guarantees absolute reliability – even in ice-cold waters.

regulator

Perfect breathing effort at 0.8 J/l / certified for diving in waters below 10 degrees / structural design made of solid brass for best cold protection / membrane-compensated design with dry seal of the first stage / reduced exhalation effort thanks to optimized exhalation membrane and bubble deflector / adjustable Venturi (dive/predive) and adjustment knob for individual inhalation comfort / innovative design of the front cover prevents free-flow in strong currents or when diving with scooters / design made of sandblasted brass, matt chrome finish / 2 HP and 4 LP outlets / mouthpiece made of high-quality, anti-allergic silicone for maximum comfort.

regulator

Amazing underwater adventures with the IR-50

The IR-50 is the top regulator for advanced and experienced divers. Natural breathing is the essence of this regulator.

regulator

Ideal breathing effort at 0.8 J/l /certified for diving in waters below 10 degrees / compensated membrane / adjustable venturi (dive/predive) and adjustment knob for individual inhalation comfort/ outlet valve and deflector for minimum exhalation effort and reduction of bubbles on the face / design made of sandblasted brass, matt chrome finish / 2 HP and 4 NP outlets / mouthpiece made of high-quality, anti-allergic silicone for maximum comfort.

regulatorregulator

The Workhorse – our CS-30

For diving centres and diving beginners – the workhorse stands for strong construction, reliability and robustness. Perfect for your training.

regulator

Optimal breathing effort at 0.8 J/l /recommended for diving in waters above 10 degrees / non-compensated piston / adjustable venturi (dive/predive) / outlet valve and deflector for minimum exhalation effort and reduction of bubbles on the face / design made of sandblasted brass, matt chrome finish / 1 HP and 3 NP outlets / mouthpiece made of high-quality, anti-allergic silicone for maximum comfort.

regulatorregulator

Octopus OP-30

The OP-30 is the ideal addition to all DYNAMICNORD regulators. It is identical in construction to the CS-30.

regulator

The TR-80, IR-50, CS-30 (DIN & INT) regulators and the Octopus OP-30 are available from DYNAMICNORD dealers and in the online store.

DYNAMICNORD – Your Outdoor Companion.

www.dynamicnord.com

Continue Reading

Marine Life & Conservation

Paul Watson Released as Denmark Blocks Japan’s Extradition Bid

Published

on

paul watson

Renowned anti-whaling activist Paul Watson has been released from custody in Greenland after spending five months in detention. Denmark’s Justice Ministry rejected Japan’s request for his extradition, citing insufficient guarantees that his time already served in custody would be credited against any potential sentence.

The 74-year-old Canadian-American was arrested on July 21 in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, when his ship docked to refuel. His arrest was based on a 2012 Japanese warrant related to a 2010 encounter in Antarctic waters. Japan alleged Watson obstructed operations and caused damage to a whaling research ship during efforts to disrupt illegal whaling. Watson has consistently denied these claims, maintaining his commitment to marine conservation.

Denmark, which oversees extradition matters for Greenland, concluded that while the legal conditions for extradition were met, the lack of assurances from Japan regarding time-served credit made extradition untenable.

In a video shared by his foundation, Watson expressed gratitude and relief, saying, “After five months, it’s good to be out… and good to know they’re not sending me to Japan.” He added that the most difficult part of his time in custody was being separated from his two young sons.

Watson is a pioneering figure in marine conservation, known for founding the Captain Paul Watson Foundation in 2022 after decades of activism with the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. His bold efforts to defend marine life have earned him widespread support, including from celebrities and conservationists. His work has also been featured in the acclaimed reality TV series Whale Wars.

Watson’s lawyer, Jonas Christoffersen, praised the decision, stating, “We are happy and relieved that Paul Watson is now free.” He added that Watson is eager to reunite with his family and continue his vital work.

The arrest occurred while Watson’s vessel, the M/Y John Paul DeJoria, was en route to the North Pacific with a team of 26 volunteers to intercept a Japanese whaling ship. His foundation described the arrest as politically motivated and emphasized that Watson’s actions were focused on ending illegal whaling practices.

Japan resumed commercial whaling in 2019 after leaving the International Whaling Commission, asserting that whale meat is a cultural tradition. Conservationists, however, continue to challenge these practices, highlighting their impact on marine ecosystems.

Despite the challenges, Watson remains steadfast in his mission to protect marine life and bring attention to whaling practices. His dedication to ocean conservation has made him a globally respected advocate for the environment.

Continue Reading

E-Newsletter Sign up!

Instagram Feed

Shortcode field is empty!Shortcode field is empty!

Popular