News
Head of Cayman Islands Department of Environment Urges Extreme Caution before Moving Forward with Controversial Cruise Berthing Plan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9072e/9072e83e6b6e6a5ea12848fede74dee4523e50c6" alt="Cayman"
Since its release in early June, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been at the centre of the heated debate over economic and environmental costs associated with the proposed port in George Town Harbor. Director of the Cayman Islands Department of the Environment Gina Ebanks-Petrie, who also headed the Environmental Assessment Board (EAB) that coordinated the impact study, is urging extreme caution before moving ahead with the project and pleading with decision makers and the public to take a closer look at what’s at stake.
The EIS projects that 15 acres of protected coral reefs will be destroyed by construction and dredging, and another 15 acres are at risk. Lost will be the exceptional underwater visibility that Cayman is world-renowned for. George Town Harbour is one of the few working ports in the Caribbean, if not the only one, with crystal clear water and vibrant coral reefs within easy access of the cruise ships’ anchorage.
The reefs, which include Soto’s Reef, Eden Rock and the Wreck of the Balboa, are so unique because it is rare to find such well developed, high relief reefs so close to, and easily accessible from shore. These reefs have also been protected under the Marine Parks system for over 25 years so fish life is abundant and diverse. These are two of the main factors which contribute to a bustling watersports scene in the harbor. Scuba diving, snorkeling, submarine trips, glass bottom boat excursions are offered primarily for cruise ship passengers.
“If the additional 15 acres of reefs disappear, or are no longer useable because they are dead or water clarity is so poor, it will be extremely difficult to find other similar sites which could easily absorb the displaced businesses and visitors, particularly given the cruise ships’ limited time in port,” says Ebanks-Petrie. “Possible alternative options for snorkeling, like Stingray City, are already over-subscribed and under tremendous stress as a result.”
The loss of these reefs has huge implications for the Cayman Islands on an international level. The Department of Environment has heard from international agencies and individuals during the public consultation process, and Gina Ebanks-Petrie says the vast majority urged the country not to proceed with the project because of the permanent and irreversible damage. For example, the President and CEO of PADI Worldwide “implores the Cayman Islands Government to cease plans to initiate this project and seek alternative solutions to mitigate the situation and not destroy the priceless natural underwater assets belonging to Grand Cayman Island”.
“In addition to the obvious impact of the loss of these world-famous dive sites on our dive tourism product, the biggest impact will likely be on our reputation as a jurisdiction with a long history of valuing and prioritizing the protection of its marine environment,” she said.
“Coral reefs all over the world are under serious threat on various fronts: coastal development, over-fishing, sedimentation, climate change, etc. Marine scientists are agreed that we need to take all possible steps to protect remaining reefs at the same time as taking corrective action to address the threats, both locally and globally,” added the DOE director.
Cayman’s watersports operators and local environmentalists, alarmed by the projected damage to the reefs and dive sites have organized under the banner of SaveCayman.org to fight the project and raise awareness in the community. Dock supporters point to mitigation options outlined in the EIS report, but Ebanks-Petrie cautions against misinterpreting the report.
“The pro-port side seems to take comfort from these mitigation options, but what is being missed, or glossed over, is that the environmental study also assesses the effect of those measures, and the consultants judge that they will have little or no effect on reducing the severity of the impacts,” she said. “The public and decision makers need to remember that “mitigation” of an impact does not equal complete removal of the impact, and they should focus on the severity of the predicted residual impact i.e. those impacts which remain even after the use of mitigation measures.”
“For example, the consultants score the impact of dredging on water quality in George Town Harbour (GTH) as a Significant negative impact (-D) and this remains a Significant Negative impact (-D) after the application of the recommended mitigation measure – the installation of silt curtains,” she explains. The same applies to the possible relocation of the historic Wreck of the Balboa.
Consultants classify the destruction of coral reef during dredging in the highest tier of negative impacts – a Major negative impact (-E). Following implementation of the recommended mitigation measure – the coral relocation programme – it is still classified as a Significant Negative Impact (-D).
“Even with these proposed mitigation measures, that come with a significant price tag, the resulting situation is still extremely dire, and this seems to be lost in the sound bites being heard in the news,” said Ebanks-Petrie.
Cayman already has a competitive cruise tourism product as illustrated by the industry’s own report (BREA 2012) which indicates that 90% of cruise visitors to Grand Cayman disembark while in port, and the Department of Tourism’s statistics on cruise arrivals indicate that at the end of 2015 numbers of cruise visitors will reach 1.7 million. Beyond this, numbers are set to increase, all without the construction of berthing facilities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/809e9/809e9583279fae6528961fa9a633077490765f0e" alt="Cayman"
George Town Harbour is a favorite site for many watersports operators who offer excursions for cruise ship passengers.
“The Department of Environment fully acknowledges the contribution that cruise tourism makes to the economy, and the need to upgrade and improve the arrival and departure experience of cruise visitors. However, after careful consideration of the environmental losses and the risk to the overall tourism product associated with berthing facilities, our view is that a scheme of appropriate landside enhancements would offer the best solution.”
Ebanks-Petrie says the Environmental Statement has attempted to place a dollar value on the economic losses associated with the destruction of the George Town Harbour reefs and the Statement recommends that these preliminary estimates are appropriately incorporated into the updated Business Case.
“The Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Assessment Board’s review of it are stunningly clear and shows that the government should not approve the plan as described,” says Dr. Ellen Prager, marine scientist and author who has been outspoken against the project. “The reefs and the wreck lost to dredging and sedimentation associated with dredging cannot be relocated or transplanted, and it is unclear what other unintended consequences to other nearshore habitats and environments will occur.”
Ebanks-Petrie says moving forward, given the projected cost of the project, it is critical that the predicted economic benefits of the berthing facility are based on real data and factual information and that the economic business case does not rely solely on assumptions, speculation and the opinions of those persons directly involved in the cruise tourism industry.
“From where I sit, the economic business case does not appear to have been held to the same standard of actual data collection and robust analysis and scrutiny as the environmental impact assessment; I see this as a significant problem for decision-makers,” said the head of the Department of Environment.
“It is our mission to inform and educate the public about Cayman’s fragile environment and to try to ensure that decisions made today, which will impact future generations, are based on accurate facts,” says Keith Sahm who is spearheading Save Cayman. “Once the decision is made, Cayman will have to deal with the consequences.”
About Save Cayman
Save Cayman (www.savecayman.org) is a grassroots organization of individuals who share a mission to protect the underwater environment of the Cayman Islands, while promoting sustainable tourism for future generations. It was formed by concerned individuals responding to an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that projected the destruction of coral reefs in advance of the government-proposed cruise berthing facility in George Town harbour.
News
Palau Packs Its Bags: The Pacific Island Paradise Heads to ITB Berlin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/825d3/825d3fb9c8104ff35e0cbbb249b85310d4ef0eca" alt="palau"
Palau showcases its sustainability initiatives and unique culture at ITB Berlin 2025
Palau, a world-renowned destination for divers and nature lovers, is making its return to ITB Berlin after several years.
The world’s largest tourism trade show, taking place from March 4 to 6, 2025, provides the perfect platform for the island nation to highlight its unique attractions in culture, diving, snorkeling, and sustainable tourism.
Located in the western Pacific as part of the Caroline Islands in Micronesia, the Republic of Palau consists of over 340 picturesque islands. While it boasts limited landmass, it offers an abundance of natural wonders—both above and below the water’s surface.
Palau is recognized as a global leader in environmental conservation, having implemented forward-thinking measures to protect its natural resources. In 2009, Palau established the world’s first national shark sanctuary, banning commercial shark fishing. To further safeguard its marine biodiversity, Palau designated a 193,000-square-mile fully protected marine reserve in 2015, preserving habitats for over 1,500 fish species and approximately 700 types of coral.
Palau’s participation in ITB marks a significant moment for the island nation, celebrated for its crystal-clear waters, pristine coral reefs, and exceptional marine biodiversity. Visitors to Palau’s booth will discover what the future of sustainable tourism looks like, as environmental protection is deeply embedded in the DNA of its inhabitants. Additionally, Palau stands out as one of the few nations where women hold an officially recognized, central role in society.
“We are thrilled to return to Germany and share the beauty and diversity of Palau with the world,” said Leah Asanuma, Member of the Board, who will lead Palau’s delegation at the event. “ITB provides us with an outstanding platform to position Palau as a leading destination for sustainable tourism and one of the last true paradises for underwater adventures and nature enthusiasts.”
Amid growing global efforts to promote eco-friendly tourism, Palau continues to set the standard with initiatives such as the “Palau Pledge,” which visitors sign to commit to respecting and protecting the island nation’s environment during their stay. These and other groundbreaking measures will be highlighted at ITB to raise awareness about the preservation of marine ecosystems.
ITB offers visitors a unique opportunity to delve into Palau’s culture and natural beauty while planning unforgettable trips. The Palau Visitors Authority warmly invites everyone to explore their booth and be inspired by the pristine paradise that is Palau.
Find Palau’s representatives in Hall 4.1, Booth 218 where they will share everything there is to know about their extraordinary homeland.
For more information about Palau, please visit: www.pristineparadisepalau.com or follow us on social media at https://www.instagram.com/visitpalau/ or https://www.facebook.com/pristineparadisepalau/
Photo credit: © Palau Visitors Authority
News
Go Diving Show 2025 Inspiration Stage Speaker: James Neal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f68d/5f68d619fdfc298f22f849b05e7a1500e2956a2b" alt="go diving show 2025"
Technical diver, instructor and underwater photographer James Neal will be giving a must-see presentation at the GO Diving Show in March on the Inspiration Stage, detailing – warts and all – his battle to get back to dive fitness after surviving a grade four bleed on the brain in the form of a subarachnoid haemorrhage.
An experienced recreational and technical diver and instructor, James is a brand ambassador for Atomic Aquatics, BARE, Hollis, Oceanic, Stahlsac and Zeagle, and an accomplished underwater photographer and feature writer, as well as being a passionate wreck and cave diver.
He is well known in the diving fraternity for having survived a serious subarachnoid haemorrhage, and for fighting his way back to dive fitness when many said he would never dive again. He has stood up against stigmatism, ignorance and discrimination in the dive industry against the disabled for over ten years and has now completed over 1,200 dives post-haemorrhage, some 1,650-plus in total to date (and counting), to depths in excess of 80m, and he enjoys travelling the globe in search of his next diving adventure.
His presentation will cover his entire journey, from his initial recovery, medical sign off, anxieties, challenges (physical and mental), stigmatism and discrimination, starting from recreational all the way through to technical and cave diving.
Go Diving Show 2025 takes place at the NAEC Stoneleigh Park, Coventry, on the 1st -2nd March.
-
Gear Reviews2 months ago
Gear Review: SurfEars 4
-
Marine Life & Conservation2 months ago
Paul Watson Released as Denmark Blocks Japan’s Extradition Bid
-
Blogs3 months ago
Experience Malta and Gozo in 2025: A Paradise for Divers and Culture Lovers
-
Blogs3 months ago
Jeff Goodman Launches Underwater Moviemaker Course with NovoScuba
-
News5 days ago
Humpback Mother and Calf Win Underwater Photographer of the Year 2025
-
News3 months ago
Dive into Adventure: Limited Space Available for January Socorro Liveaboard Trip with Oyster Diving
-
News1 month ago
2-for-1 tickets now available for GO Diving Show
-
News2 weeks ago
Filming 360 in The Bahamas